1 |
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:15:42 -0600 |
2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:33:10PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:41:02 -0600 |
6 |
> > William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > > All, |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > as part of bug 599044 [1], I have created a tmpfiles project which is a |
11 |
> > > standalone utility to handle systemd style tmpfiles.d files. |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > > There is currently a live ebuild in the tree, but I haven't done any |
14 |
> > > releases yet. |
15 |
> > > |
16 |
> > > Take a look at it, and anything about it is open for discussion at this |
17 |
> > > point. |
18 |
> > > |
19 |
> > > The name is a bit vague, but honestly I couldn't figure out a better |
20 |
> > > name. I don't really want openrc in the name, because this is meant to |
21 |
> > > be more generic than that; it is not meant to require OpenRC to run. |
22 |
> > > OpenRC will use it, but not the other way around. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > opentmpfiles? tmprc? :-D |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Hmm, I don't know if you are being serious or just messing with me, but |
27 |
> if you are being serious I'll consider opentmpfiles. In a way that makes |
28 |
> sense because of openrc/openresolv/opentmpfiles. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> If there are no objections I'll rename it. |
31 |
|
32 |
Just throwing names alike openrc/netifrc around. I don't mind either |
33 |
way. |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Best regards, |
37 |
Michał Górny |
38 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |