| 1 |
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 23:52 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I just don't see how "noarch" will help the portage tree. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I would propose to use it for the 100+ app-xemacs packages, all of which |
| 6 |
run within the virtual machine that is xemacs. Obviously |
| 7 |
app-editors/xemacs, the editor itself, will still be keyworded for each |
| 8 |
arch, but the chance of running into arch-specific issues with the |
| 9 |
packages is very small, and they are released independently from the |
| 10 |
editor. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The same thing may apply to a number of dev-ruby/* packages (those |
| 13 |
installing only ruby code), but that would need per-package |
| 14 |
investigation. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Hans |
Archives