Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | ||
| Date: | Sat, 28 Sep 2013 19:51:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130928205114.21c4a32a@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots by Kent Fredric |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:47:52 +1300 |
| 2 | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > For that, a slot-dict approach is far more sane. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | The only reason anyone can make that claim is that no-one really knows |
| 6 | what slot dictionaries are or how they'd work in practice. Until |
| 7 | there's a rough description of how they work and a prototype |
| 8 | implementation, "subslot dictionaries" is like "magic beans". |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |