| 1 |
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:50:40 +0000 Renat Lumpau <rl03@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
| On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:31:37PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
| > today's lesson: proactive QA is frowned upon, it's only a bug when |
| 4 |
| > a user files a report at bugs.gentoo.org |
| 5 |
| |
| 6 |
| I don't think that's the lesson. It oughtta be: we need a way to |
| 7 |
| figure out which QA issues are important and which are less so. A QA |
| 8 |
| team member's opinion (personal attacks, whatever) should be an |
| 9 |
| important input but not the final say. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Important QA issues are, first and foremost, the ones that can be |
| 12 |
detected and fixed quickly. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) |
| 16 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 17 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives