Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: esethome
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:17:10
Message-Id: 4FDB35AB.8060200@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: esethome by Mike Frysinger
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 13/06/12 04:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 June 2012 15:35:40 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> --- user.eclass [some timestamp] +++ >> user.eclass.esethome [some other timestamp] @@ -388,3 +388,63 >> @@ } >> >> fi + +# @FUNCTION: esethome > > has to be inside the giant if block. so put this above the "fi". > >> +# @USAGE: <user> <homedir> +# @DESCRIPTION: +# Update the home >> directory in a platform-agnostic way. +# Required parameters is >> the username and the new home directory. +# Specify -1 if you >> want to set home to the enewuser default +# of /dev/null. +# If >> the new home directory does not exist, it is created. +# Any >> previously existing home directory is NOT moved. +esethome() { + >> _assert_pkg_ebuild_phase ${FUNCNAME} + + # get the >> username + local euser=$1; shift + if [[ -z ${euser} >> ]] ; then + eerror "No username specified !" + >> die "Cannot call esethome without a username" + fi + + >> # lets see if the username already exists + if [[ ! -n >> $(egetent passwd "${euser}") ]] ; then > > "! -n" -> "-z" -mike
So outside of syntax issues like above, anyone have any issues with my adding this to user.eclass ? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk/bNaoACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAFRgEApwLkrsqSIW0nVK4l/dUTRzV9 ijEnbfa+BLc1skwfW4QA+gKgpmsz/K5VqXnVWyXocGqO98RYJL8lL3qm7k0Hs6uZ =9i38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----