1 |
Hi! |
2 |
|
3 |
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009, Tobias Klausmann wrote: |
4 |
> If it works, I'll test drive it for a while and report back. |
5 |
|
6 |
I've been running a patched glibc-2.9_p20081201-r1 for a week |
7 |
now. Nothing broke and I've been unable to trigger the lost |
8 |
packet syndrome by using getaddrinfo(). I was still able to |
9 |
produce it by sending UDP packets myself, but that was to be |
10 |
expected. |
11 |
|
12 |
So in essence, the patch I mentioned "works". We could use it |
13 |
should we want to have a glibc 2.9. On the bug mentioned earlier |
14 |
(where I got the patch from), one of the glibc guys mentions that |
15 |
more work is planned for the resolver part of glibc, so this |
16 |
whole ordeal may pass us. |
17 |
|
18 |
Regards, |
19 |
Tobias |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
printk("NONONONOO!!!!\n"); |
23 |
linux-2.6.6/drivers/atm/zatm.c |