Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Kahle <tomka@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:39:29
Message-Id: 20110921163657.GH12639@denkmatte
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please don't use IUSE=static-libs unless really necessary by "Michał Górny"
On 09:10 Mon 19 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:39:32 -0400 > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: > > > On Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:16:30 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > '$(use_enable static-libs static)' themselves. While at it, it > > > > may be better to just drop the flag if no other package relies on > > > > it and no user has ever requested the static build of that > > > > package. > > > > > > I don't see any harm with including IUSE="static-libs" for every > > > package that has working/usable static libraries[1]. Why wait for > > > users to request it on bugzilla when it's a near-zero-cost and > > > zero-maintenance to add it to ebuilds? > > > > i missed this sentence from Michał's e-mail. unconditionally not > > building static libraries is against policy. if you install shared > > libs that get linked against, then you must provide static libraries > > unconditionally as well or support IUSE=static-libs. maintainers do > > not get to choose "no one has asked for it and no one in the tree is > > using it thus my ebuild isnt going to". -mike > > Where is that policy? AFAIK the policy was to 'follow upstream'
Really? For scientific libraries this means 'static only'. Cheers, Thomas
> which > usually means 'shared only'. I really don't see a reason to build > static libtorrent as upstream even doesn't support static linking. > > -- > Best regards, > Michał Górny
-- Thomas Kahle http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies