| 1 |
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 14:25:02 +0100 |
| 2 |
"M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 16/06/17 09:27, Matthias Maier wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017, at 18:15 CDT, Matthias Maier |
| 6 |
> > <tamiko@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> Hello all, |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> this is a series of patches against the toolchian-funcs and |
| 10 |
> >> toolchain-glibc eclasses, most notably |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> > Pushed. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Best, |
| 15 |
> > Matthias |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> .. That was quick ... |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I swore there was something in the devmanual about a nice long period |
| 20 |
> of bikeshedding before changes to eclasses were approved .. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Maintainers are not even required to send their changes to the ML |
| 24 |
before committing. They do it because they think it makes sense to |
| 25 |
have some review for eclasses having a wide usage. Sending trivial |
| 26 |
changes here instead of b.g.o can be seen as spam. |
Archives