| 1 |
Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:54:02 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Raphael Marichez <falco@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> IMHO this seems a good idea. The portage tree is growing every week, |
| 6 |
>> every month, and it doesn't really suit for the very little systems |
| 7 |
>> (embedded linux) nowadays. Furthermore, with the old 2.0-portage, the |
| 8 |
>> syncing and caching had become really long. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If you want to sync just part of the tree, look into setting '--exclude' |
| 11 |
> or '--exclude-from' options via PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS in make.conf. |
| 12 |
> See rsync(1) and make.conf(5). Never tried it myself, but it should |
| 13 |
> work. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-2551222.html |
Archives