Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Curtis Napier <curtis119@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Assigning bugs to treecleaners
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:26:38
Message-Id: 44A3101C.7040908@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Assigning bugs to treecleaners by "Kevin F. Quinn"
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:54:02 +0200 > Raphael Marichez <falco@g.o> wrote: > >> IMHO this seems a good idea. The portage tree is growing every week, >> every month, and it doesn't really suit for the very little systems >> (embedded linux) nowadays. Furthermore, with the old 2.0-portage, the >> syncing and caching had become really long. > > If you want to sync just part of the tree, look into setting '--exclude' > or '--exclude-from' options via PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS in make.conf. > See rsync(1) and make.conf(5). Never tried it myself, but it should > work. >
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-2551222.html

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature