| 1 |
Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 04:24:35AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>I just had an idea (how rare, eh?) and I wanted to see what other people |
| 5 |
>>thought of it. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>What if we renamed all the *-config tools to config-* (gcc-config, |
| 8 |
>>distcc-config, java-config, etc. would move to config-gcc, |
| 9 |
>>config-distcc, config-java, etc.)? |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>>This would allow people trying to configure anything to simply type |
| 12 |
>>config-<tab> and get a listing of what was available. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> +1 here. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> For the moment, add a symlink with the config-* name, and over time, |
| 17 |
> lets go to putting the packages as being named config-* with an extra |
| 18 |
> symlink as *-config until we are sure they are all gone. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
+1 too |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'd like to keep the symlink for compatibility if they don't clash with |
| 23 |
the path-config tools. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I'd prefer to avoid branding anyway (please NO gentoo-config-*). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Luca Barbato |
| 29 |
Developer |
| 30 |
Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives