1 |
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 02:40:49PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > On 04/29/2011 09:26 PM, Mark Loeser wrote: |
4 |
> >> "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" <ssuominen@g.o> said: |
5 |
> >>> ssuominen 11/04/29 18:13:31 |
6 |
> >>> |
7 |
> >>> Removed: transmission-2.12.ebuild |
8 |
> >>> Log: |
9 |
> >>> drop old, broken with stable libnotify |
10 |
> >>> |
11 |
> >>> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha30/cvs/Linux x86_64, RepoMan options: --force) |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> >> When removing an ebuild, please do document it in the ChangeLog. |
14 |
> >> |
15 |
> >> Thanks, |
16 |
> >> |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > no thanks |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Posts like these just make me want to unsubscribe. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Is there actually some debate as to whether ebuild removals should be |
23 |
> documented in the ChangeLog? Why shouldn't this be done? It hardly |
24 |
> takes any time at all. |
25 |
|
26 |
Not that I know of. AFAIK, all changes made to ebuilds are supposed to |
27 |
be documented in the ChangeLog. That includes version bumps, removals, |
28 |
stabilizations, everything. |
29 |
|
30 |
No, there is no good reason not to do this. |
31 |
|
32 |
William |