From: | Terje Kvernes <terjekv@××××××××.no> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving stability - checkpoints | ||
Date: | Sat, 20 Apr 2002 05:58:36 | ||
Message-Id: | wxx4ri6skkk.fsf@nommo.uio.no | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving stability - checkpoints by Bill Kenworthy |
1 | Bill Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> writes: |
2 | |
3 | [ about checkpoints ] |
4 | |
5 | > Now this would be a *real* advance in taking some of the risk out of |
6 | > bleeding edge for all users, average and developer. |
7 | |
8 | yup, and it should be very doable. it is basically the same stuff |
9 | as I've worked on recently, with a slightly different name. :) |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Terje |