From: | "Paweł Hajdan | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date | ||
Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:19:35 | ||
Message-Id: | 4ED4CD84.5090004@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: making the stable tree more up-to-date by Rich Freeman |
1 | On 11/24/11 6:12 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 | > I support stabilizing bug-free newer versions of maintainer-needed |
3 | > packages that already have stable versions. I'm not sure I'd extend |
4 | > that to stabilizing packages that have no stable versions already. |
5 | > [...] |
6 | > Those benefits don't exist for a package that has no stable versions |
7 | > to begin with. |
8 | |
9 | Yup, just for clarity my script doesn't consider packages with no stable |
10 | versions for stabilization candidates. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |