1 |
On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 11:13:55 PM Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:23:46 +0900 Aaron Bauman wrote: |
3 |
..... |
4 |
|
5 |
> Please understand me correctly: I'm not blaming you or security |
6 |
> team for this or that issue. But it looks like security team indeed |
7 |
> needs to review some policies and approaches to suit needs of |
8 |
> Gentoo users better in both of terms of security and usability, to |
9 |
> find some reasonable compromise between them, which will satisfy |
10 |
> most users. For these very issues it looks like canceling "removal |
11 |
> in 30 days" clause from p.mask action will do the job. |
12 |
|
13 |
+1 on this. Please don't simply tree-clean packages because of security |
14 |
issues. Masking them with a reference to the security issues should be |
15 |
sufficient. |
16 |
|
17 |
Some applications can easily be used safely even with gaping security holes. |
18 |
(A heavily firewalled box or air-gap comes to mind). |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Joost |