Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: multilib <multilib@g.o>, qa <qa@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Replacing binary-only SLOTs with separate packages
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:56:06
Message-Id: 1547884554.1154.1.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Replacing binary-only SLOTs with separate packages by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 23:31 +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2 > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 09:13:34PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
3 > > Firstly, it is confusing to developers. Let's analyze the dependencies
4 > > on dev-libs/openssl. A quick grep reveals seven patterns. They are
5 > > listed below, along with occurrence counts and percentages:
6 > >
7 > > dev-libs/openssl 278 7.8% }
8 > > dev-libs/openssl:* 49 1.4% } 14.2%
9 > > dev-libs/openssl:= 178 5.0% }
10 > > dev-libs/openssl:0 660 18.6%
11 > > dev-libs/openssl:0= 2381 67.0%
12 > > dev-libs/openssl:0/0 4 0.1%
13 > > dev-libs/openssl:0/1.1 2 0.1%
14 >
15 > This was based just on ebuilds right?
16
17 On md5-cache, to be more precise. The numbers and percentages are
18 on total dependency occurrences (i.e. if an ebuild lists openssl three
19 times, it counts as 3).
20
21 --
22 Best regards,
23 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature