| 1 |
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 11:13 Sun 27 Feb , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> a quick mail to announce that the gnome team, in order to prepare for |
| 5 |
>>> gnome 3, started slotting a lot of gnome team managed packages. If you |
| 6 |
>>> find yourself using such a package, please update your ebuilds to use |
| 7 |
>>> slot notations or other EAPI compliant notation resulting in the same |
| 8 |
>>> effect. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> This email would be much more useful if it included a list of affected |
| 11 |
>> packages, sorted by maintainer and/or herd. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> As requested, here is a (probably) complete list of packages which |
| 15 |
> depend on x11-libs/gtk+ without a slot. The list was generated using |
| 16 |
> the tinderbox rindex, so it may be slightly out of date. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I just realized that there was a bug in my script which caused the |
| 20 |
maintainer-sorted list to not group packages together. Attached is an |
| 21 |
updated list. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |
Archives