1 |
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:03:10 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
5 |
>>wrote: |
6 |
>>> Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 13:27:08 |
7 |
>>> "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org> napisał(a): |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>>> Not sure if this idea has been discussed before, but: |
10 |
>>>> Wouldn't it be an idea to have a "virtual/init" which depends on 1 |
11 |
>>>> of: |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> You mean our virtual/service-manager? |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>>Michał is already well-aware of this one, but for general interest, |
17 |
>>the main blocker to actually doing this is: |
18 |
>>https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504116 |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Which is really a shame that there's such slow progress. I already added |
21 |
> several patches to the blocking bugs but none was fixed meanwhile... |
22 |
|
23 |
A possible solution is to remove it in the next version of openrc, as |
24 |
it is deprecated already. Another solution is to ask the Council to |
25 |
let somebody apply patches if the maintainer is unresponsive, set a |
26 |
deadline, etc. |
27 |
|
28 |
Since many of the packages are system packages letting them break |
29 |
isn't really an option. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Rich |