| 1 |
16.02.2015 14:44, Markos Chandras пишет: |
| 2 |
> On 02/16/15 13:31, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Am Montag 16 Februar 2015, 06:13:10 schrieb Mike Frysinger: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>> even then, deleting an ebuild purely due to different copyright |
| 6 |
>>> is complete bs. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> The requirement for Gentoo copyright in the main tree is not |
| 9 |
>> optional, but has been policy for a very long time. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> Just because you've been around forever doesnt mean you can break |
| 12 |
>> the rules that everyone else is supposed to follow. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I too believe that if you are reverting someone's commit you should at |
| 16 |
> least drop him an email to let him know. How else do you expect him to |
| 17 |
> know he did something wrong? I am a bit worried QA is taking such |
| 18 |
> actions without communicating that with the developer. If you don't |
| 19 |
> let people know they do mistakes, it's likely they will do them again. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
This is clear violation of our QA policy and AGAIN, patrick is involved. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
@patrick: vapier claims that he was not aware about your actions. But |
| 26 |
according to our policy you should notify maintainer. At least in case |
| 27 |
of serious actions. I am sure that dropping package is a damn serious |
| 28 |
action. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I am not sure how should i proceed. Your work for QA is much |
| 31 |
appreciated, but, think about this message as a first warning from me as |
| 32 |
QA team lead to you. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Please, be more communicative with your fellow developers. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 38 |
Gentoo developer |
| 39 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
| 40 |
Gentoo Quality Assurance project lead |
| 41 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |
Archives