| 1 |
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:12:47 +0000 |
| 2 |
Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Following a discussion in #gentoo-portage earlier this evening, it was |
| 5 |
> suggested that I send out an RFC email for this. So, does anyone |
| 6 |
> object to requiring that any variable listed in USE_EXPAND be treated |
| 7 |
> as incremental, at least as far as profile inheritance is concerned? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The main problem I see is that if it's becoming a real incremental |
| 10 |
(across all config layers) it would change behavior for users as they'd |
| 11 |
need to prefix their use-expanded vars with -* to retain their current |
| 12 |
config. But I guess that's why you added that final clause about |
| 13 |
profile scope. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Marius |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives