Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 14:51:47
Message-Id: 20160519165130.7e9bc385@wim.fritz.box
1 Perhaps it's a good idea to add a section to the devmanual about adding
2 new keywords to packages.
3
4 Recruits in particular might benefit from some background on what
5 keywording means and when it should be done, especially before they
6 start maintaining packages and then realise their packages are so
7 beautiful that they positively *deserve* to have some random keywords
8 added. This is not productive.
9
10 The way it works is that users of
11 specific architectures find that a package works for them on their
12 systems (which have enough resources and have the correct interfaces for
13 that particular program to be used conveniently, and so on), and that
14 they then request that their architecture keyword be added. What
15 doesn't work is having a handful of keywords on a package that nobody
16 cares about who actually uses the architectures in question.
17
18 Since over the years the Random Keyword Requests happen a *lot* right
19 after recruitment, it might even be useful to ask about this in the
20 quizzes. (The answer: your time is better spent fixing actual bugs.
21 bumping versions, adding features and maintaining a stable branch,
22 rather than raising the architecture count for your packages for no
23 adequately explored reason.)
24
25
26 Kind regards,
27 jer

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o>