| 1 |
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 07:05:11PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 10:16:24PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> obviously you only mean linux x86/amd64 dev profiles. i dont have a strong |
| 5 |
> >> opinion on that small subset in either direction. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > So do you agree to make this linker option default to linux x86/amd64 dev/ |
| 8 |
> > profiles? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> add them or dont add them, "i dont have a [...] opinion [...] in |
| 11 |
> either direction". if put to a vote, i'd abstain. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Possibly a stupid question, but any reason we've not looked at |
| 14 |
injecting something that has lower actual affect but can still be used |
| 15 |
for a canary? I'm thinking of --build-id specifically... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
~brian |
Archives