| 1 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:48:39 +0200 |
| 2 |
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> James Cloos wrote: |
| 5 |
> > When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live |
| 6 |
> > ebuilds. Git-9999 is the one I remember. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Those should not get nuked during global cleanups, as they are likely to |
| 9 |
> > be in active use notwithstanding their keywording or masking. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > -JimC |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Their maintainers should be active and switch their ebuilds to EAPI 2. |
| 14 |
> If they don't have an active maintainer, then do we want to keep live |
| 15 |
> ebuilds for them around? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Your stated goal was to remove unused ebuilds, which live ebuilds are not, |
| 18 |
regardless of the status of the maintainer. And I'm pretty sure git has an |
| 19 |
active maintainer. :P |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. |
| 24 |
gcc-porting, |
| 25 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives