Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Bruce A. Locke" <blocke@××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 16:32:14
Message-Id: 20010923183241.338f93a8.blocke@shivan.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound by Mikael Hallendal
1 On 23 Sep 2001 17:14:18 +0200
2 Mikael Hallendal <micke@×××××××××××.se> wrote:
3
4 > Btw, what idiot would name the package so that 0.2.22 is not newer than
5 > 0.2.5?
6
7 I'm assuming this is the case because the test for 0.2.5+ fails in the
8 BitchX configure script and the authors website shows 0.2.8 as the most
9 recent version. Either way BitchX isn't building for me with 0.2.22.
10
11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
12 Bruce A. Locke
13 blocke@××××××.org

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound "Bruce A. Locke" <blocke@××××××.org>