Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sam James <sam@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: base-system@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] unpacker.eclass: support >=app-arch/xz-utils-5.4.0 for lzip decompression
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 23:50:15
Message-Id: CF57FA6D-9717-44C1-913C-3AB8714E7BB7@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] unpacker.eclass: support >=app-arch/xz-utils-5.4.0 for lzip decompression by Ulrich Mueller
1 > On 14 Dec 2022, at 11:40, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 >>>>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2022, Sam James wrote:
4 >
5 >> *.lz)
6 >> - d="|| ( app-arch/plzip app-arch/pdlzip app-arch/lzip )" ;;
7 >> + d="
8 >> + || (
9 >> + >=app-arch/xz-utils-5.4.0
10 >> + app-arch/plzip
11 >> + app-arch/pdlzip
12 >> + app-arch/lzip
13 >> + )
14 >> + "
15 >> + ;;
16 >
17 > Shouldn't all consumers with a dependency on lzip be revbumped?
18 > Otherwise emerge --depclean (in the default configuration) won't drop
19 > lzip.
20
21 We can do that once xz-utils-5.4.x is stable to avoid doing it twice,
22 I suppose.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature