1 |
Dale wrote: |
2 |
> I'm a user, tho a lowly one, and even I look in the changelogs from |
3 |
> time to time. I don't even see why this should be discussed. If you |
4 |
> *change* something, but it in the *change* log. If not, maybe the |
5 |
> changelog should be called something else. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Using the logic that something being removed is not a change, then |
8 |
> adding something is a change either. Adding something is important |
9 |
> and I think something being removed is important too. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Dale |
12 |
I'm a user, tho a lowly one, and even I look in the changelogs from time |
13 |
to time. I don't even see why this should be discussed. If you |
14 |
*change* something, put it in the *change* log. If not, maybe the |
15 |
changelog should be called something else. |
16 |
|
17 |
Using the logic that something being removed is not a change, then |
18 |
adding something is not a change either. Adding something is important |
19 |
and I think something being removed is important too. |
20 |
|
21 |
Dale |
22 |
|
23 |
:-) :-) |
24 |
|
25 |
P. S. Corrected some bad typos. lol I need new glasses and better |
26 |
fingers. |