Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Preparing profiles for EAPI 3 IUSE strictness
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:46:56
Message-Id: b41005390907070146j6c4298edh68364d9b26d94776@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Preparing profiles for EAPI 3 IUSE strictness by Andrew D Kirch
1 On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Andrew D Kirch<trelane@×××××××.net> wrote:
2 > Ciaran,
3 >
4 > I've talked with the pkgcore people and they don't use the EAPI's (or
5 > PMS) in the first place. This essentially leaves you writing documents
6 > you're requiring for paludis support. As this seems to be mostly a PM
7 > issue, it should be taken elsewhere. To that end, here is a
8 > gentoo-portage-dev mailing list that is more appropriate for minor
9 > process issues such as those brought up below.
10 > I think that ending this discussion here and moving it over to a forum
11 > more appropriate to package manager development would reduce the
12 > temperature around your proposals and get them implemented (as Zac seems
13 > willing to do so). While I realize this is a general purpose mailing
14 > list, it is general purpose, and there is a mailing list specifically
15 > for portage development.
16
17 I think you are slightly misreading his intent (or I am misreading
18 it). I believe Ciaran is talking about "what gentoo should put in
19 make.defaults such that the user experience doesn't totally suck for
20 this new EAPI3 thing" and provided some ideas. I'm pretty sure
21 whether or not PM foo has implemented these things is a moot point as
22 far as this thread is concerned.
23
24 -A
25
26 >
27 > Andrew
28 >
29 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
30 >> *SNIP*
31 >
32 >