Archives
Archives
| From: | joshua saddler <nightmorph@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies | ||
| Date: | Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:56:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | D22AB704-5195-4FD0-97B5-EC341E5DEFF5@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | On Aug 20, 2013, at 11:19 AM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > My question is, how can we improve our stabilization procedures/policies |
| 4 | > so we can convince people not to run production servers on ~arch and |
| 5 | > keep the stable tree more up to date? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | do the Arch Linux thing…keep just one version of a package in the tree, as a general rule. |