Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, scarabeus@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-office/libreoffice: ChangeLog libreoffice-3.4.99.1.ebuild libreoffice-3.5.0.0.ebuild
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:36:00
Message-Id: 4EEBAB07.2010102@gentoo.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 12/12/2011 05:44 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
> scarabeus 11/12/12 17:44:48 > > Modified: ChangeLog Added: > libreoffice-3.4.99.1.ebuild Removed: > libreoffice-3.5.0.0.ebuild Log: Remove miss-named beta0. Add beta1 > with better name (presented as downgrade). > > (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha80/cvs/Linux x86_64, RepoMan options: > --force) > > Revision Changes Path 1.216 > app-office/libreoffice/ChangeLog >
I know it is a bit late but do you think that commit made sense at that time? It is not the best user experience we can provide when beta releases appear as downgrades. FWIW beta releases should remain masked to avoid useless compilations to slow machines instead of digging through Changelogs to see what happened. Are the beta releases of libreoffice so critical that force you to keep them in the ~testing tree? - -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJO66sGAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCSH0QAIKc26at3BPsEauv1Wk/6hir lfrFv0BEDgIUHwi4vFQT6xUTCYpC83Ed2wTXG7wHj2HVh2pIqnRPitvOwKYL6b7/ HCRnGo8jm8Hg906nJEPPCDJxAL34U4qaO4Lt2+cTU5g1ifxYsG8FP97gp2O18OmV CQBkacsjtpwngrZkTjonD+eeHjzoXMOXP9MWdkBwBWAEhqkkHDYjGfXKZ5byhD1j FdkKCkmKKVaCFdxbsRfMxnNEhkxQFbvmejmXKi6nrpnkWWz9c+CAm6A9btLx8FOU qop7UTRMVptMJGOWqgMV+FI/TB1Rfl/yBiq40D1FAdAcA3SdmqP3zI6Ee5PakBBo 5o49nv/DUgkv53VH1T5THyixQAv+Fcsv7caCPc91HSMPgC8YvyKwXRuks+WyFcNp UApstSl5ESOxOl2VUeUebKEbQmHgRZduSqzauFrGGHI+dUSPhFgvAuS8JZuAbadF XV5S/Pca8HUIYKf1jMfgDRwMXXnO7cNYm6HyIoYPmXaicfxAry0Bomd8HC4ZAfET 0FC9Ushx1kI4SeWp7TxXc0mtreOhtj7GkiUQf5RWpa0TNikSC5Qz21Xt3HX56YL/ MBhyrCNkb8s0YZeeNLxnQFnrANuJqGRRVPtGpCaS0lKe2MVekjBFQWXZGuWcaiFC qXK+RAqBEGam86hw2Keh =+H4t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies