1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:37:59 +0200 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> | Additionally, it would be nice if these discussions involved |
4 |
> | concerned arches and were not done ex post in future cases. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Uh, Jakub, part of the design of the devmanual was that it would be |
7 |
> possible for the right people to update it to codify existing practice |
8 |
> without arguments from the peanut gallery who like to claim that |
9 |
> because they've been getting away with it it's allowed. See also |
10 |
> conflicting USE flags and static metadata requirement... This isn't a |
11 |
> change, it's a documentation of how things are. |
12 |
|
13 |
You still didn't bring in any argument, why am I not surprised? Plus |
14 |
don't pull in unrelated stuff into this debate. Plus getting devmanual |
15 |
changed on the fly and using it as a point in discussion five minutes |
16 |
later is not an acceptable practice for anyone who wants to debate |
17 |
things seriously. |
18 |
|
19 |
> You've already wasted too much of other people's time on this. You're |
20 |
> not getting any more of mine. |
21 |
|
22 |
Please, take this, your peanut galleries and other junk off-list, |
23 |
noone's interested. |
24 |
|
25 |
Thanks. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Best regards, |
29 |
|
30 |
Jakub Moc |
31 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
32 |
GPG signature: |
33 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
34 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
35 |
|
36 |
... still no signature ;) |