Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OT noise (Was: Profile masking and profiles package.mask)
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:21:25
Message-Id: 451E6D9F.1010406@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Profile masking and profiles package.mask by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:37:59 +0200 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
3 > | Additionally, it would be nice if these discussions involved
4 > | concerned arches and were not done ex post in future cases.
5 >
6 > Uh, Jakub, part of the design of the devmanual was that it would be
7 > possible for the right people to update it to codify existing practice
8 > without arguments from the peanut gallery who like to claim that
9 > because they've been getting away with it it's allowed. See also
10 > conflicting USE flags and static metadata requirement... This isn't a
11 > change, it's a documentation of how things are.
12
13 You still didn't bring in any argument, why am I not surprised? Plus
14 don't pull in unrelated stuff into this debate. Plus getting devmanual
15 changed on the fly and using it as a point in discussion five minutes
16 later is not an acceptable practice for anyone who wants to debate
17 things seriously.
18
19 > You've already wasted too much of other people's time on this. You're
20 > not getting any more of mine.
21
22 Please, take this, your peanut galleries and other junk off-list,
23 noone's interested.
24
25 Thanks.
26
27 --
28 Best regards,
29
30 Jakub Moc
31 mailto:jakub@g.o
32 GPG signature:
33 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
34 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
35
36 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies