| 1 |
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> That makes a lot of sense. There are probably a bunch of |
| 3 |
> projects/teams where having their own branches makes some amount of |
| 4 |
> sense; but we should really try the free-for-all at first. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
So, it sounds like we have a migrated tree already. Why not just plan |
| 7 |
a few days where we tell everybody to just mirror their work as an |
| 8 |
experiment (it would be strongly encouraged but not mandatory if for |
| 9 |
some reason a few can't go along with it). So, devs would do their |
| 10 |
work in cvs, and then just do the exact same commit in git and push |
| 11 |
it. The rsync mirrors would of course stay with cvs (this is just a |
| 12 |
test). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Perhaps we might even make it a complete free-for-all with no rules at |
| 15 |
first. Then we can circle back on the list and discuss what did and |
| 16 |
didn't work well. That could include rebase-vs-merge, problems with |
| 17 |
concurrency, and so on. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
A test of some sort would cut down the risk of the unexpected when we |
| 20 |
do the real migration. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Rich |
Archives