1 |
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:55:42 +0300 |
2 |
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> Oh come on. I never said to stop supporting those arches. I just said |
4 |
> to shrink their stable tree. What do you suggest? Pretend to have |
5 |
> active exotic arches just to look shiny and pretty? |
6 |
|
7 |
Claiming to support an exotic arch but forcing people to run ~arch on |
8 |
it is not supporting it at all. One of the problems with exotic archs |
9 |
is that they are much more likely to show up bugs than things that are |
10 |
commonly used, and so knowing that something has been properly tested |
11 |
is a lot more important there. |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |