| 1 |
--- Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@××××××.nl> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 18 July 2002 20:42, you wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Thanks. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Trying this as a possibility. I also downloaded |
| 6 |
> the |
| 7 |
> > vanilla sources but haven't had time to recompile |
| 8 |
> the |
| 9 |
> > kernel yet. A couple details to add to the mix: 1) |
| 10 |
> > sitting at a console my hwclock seems to gain |
| 11 |
> about |
| 12 |
> > 2.5 minutes an hour 2) when i start gdm the time |
| 13 |
> > instantly goes backward by about 2.5 hours (I'll |
| 14 |
> do |
| 15 |
> > more tests and send the exact amount if I can find |
| 16 |
> it) |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > So based upon that it seems that some x component |
| 20 |
> is |
| 21 |
> > having issues as well as the hwclock running fast. |
| 22 |
> > Getting closer but not there yet, ugh. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Hi Ken, |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> gdm is not supposed to change anything to your time |
| 28 |
> at all. What happens when |
| 29 |
> you use xdm or kdm. But first, is your |
| 30 |
> /etc/localtime set right, and could |
| 31 |
> you send the output of a set command |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Paul |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
> Paul de Vrieze |
| 37 |
> Junior Researcher |
| 38 |
> Mail: pauldv@××××××.nl |
| 39 |
> Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
__________________________________________________ |
| 44 |
Do You Yahoo!? |
| 45 |
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes |
| 46 |
http://autos.yahoo.com |
Archives