| 1 |
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 22:59:14 +0200 foser <foser@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
| On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 21:29 +0100, Paul Waring wrote: |
| 3 |
| > Why not have a three strike rule - anyone who commits something |
| 4 |
| > straight to stable 3 times in a given period (say 6 months) has |
| 5 |
| > their CVS access revoked. |
| 6 |
| |
| 7 |
| It's not California here. You completely ignore the fact that some |
| 8 |
| people commit more than others and as such are more likely to trip |
| 9 |
| over such a rule anyway and the people who do commit a lot are usually |
| 10 |
| the same people you don't want to revoke the access from. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Actually, *most* of the regular high volume committers tend to get it |
| 13 |
right, since they're experienced enough to know exactly what they're |
| 14 |
doing and get everything right without even needing to think about it. |
| 15 |
Of course, there's the occasional notable exception who regularly screws |
| 16 |
stuff up and just plain doesn't care. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) |
| 20 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 21 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives