| 1 |
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:11:19 Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> posted f76iu0$j6u$1@×××××××××.org, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> excerpted below, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:01:53 -0600: |
| 5 |
> > Why don't we create the gentoo-project mailing |
| 6 |
> > list, and, you know, actually wait a bit to see how that actually goes. |
| 7 |
> > Then we can talk about how best to handle -dev. One shit at a time, |
| 8 |
> > people. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> +1 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> It should also be noted that it's council election time, and I don't |
| 13 |
> believe a change such as closing -dev to moderated write status is really |
| 14 |
> urgent enough to have the outgoing council handle. Let the folks running |
| 15 |
> for council now make their positions part of their platforms, and after - |
| 16 |
> project is up and running for a couple months and the new council is in |
| 17 |
> place, /then/ let's see if moderating -dev remains a burning enough issue |
| 18 |
> to be voted on. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I agree with you that this should be pulled over the election. That will also |
| 21 |
allow some time to see how the -project list works out. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Paul |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives