| 1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I don't fully understand why things (like in_iuse from |
| 4 |
> eutils.eclass) are missing from PMS. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
How should this feature have made it into PMS by now? AFAICS, you've |
| 7 |
first proposed it in the following posting, two days after EAPI 5 was |
| 8 |
approved: |
| 9 |
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260662 |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It's on the list of features for EAPI 6, so it will be included if the |
| 12 |
council approves it. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Also it would certainly help if you would attach a wording for the |
| 15 |
specification to bug 449862. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> If that applies to more features that were forgotten when writing |
| 18 |
> PMS, we have a problem :( |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Sorry, but the PMS team's crystal ball is broken. So we cannot include |
| 21 |
things before someone proposes them. ;) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Ulrich |
Archives