Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:33:32
Message-Id: 20120308193116.6f06f81d@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds by Ulrich Mueller
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 20:17:41 +0100
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> In one of them, removal of the old assignment statement had simply > been forgotten [1]. For the other two, the EAPI had been assigned by > an eclass [2], which we consider illegal anyway.
...and yet people do it. That and the violations of the HOMEPAGE rule tell you a lot about what happens when something is made syntactically valid but supposedly not legal. -- Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>