| 1 |
On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:27:19 AM Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:13:15 +0200 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Joost Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I think systemd is nice for desktops/laptops. But on servers it seems |
| 6 |
> > to be overkill to me and as I umount filesystems as part of my |
| 7 |
> > backup-scripts, having something force-mount them in the background |
| 8 |
> > is going to kill those scripts. |
| 9 |
> > But this bit is off-topic. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> It's all about replacing 'umount' with 'systemctl stop'. But if you |
| 12 |
> don't use automount, I don't think systemd will actually interfere. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That's something that needs to be looked into. I tell apache to switch to a |
| 15 |
maintenance-page which is on a filesystem that doesn't get umounted. Then I |
| 16 |
umount the websites for the backup. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The changes to the script would require more work. If openrc stays with a |
| 19 |
classical init, then I will be happy. |
| 20 |
Systemd is nice for desktops. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
And systemctl will try to remount the filesystem when simply using umount: |
| 23 |
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo- |
| 24 |
user/msg_0883f3103a3fa025cc2121117169a287.xml |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Joost |
Archives