1 |
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Freitag, 13. Juni 2008, Santiago M. Mola wrote: |
3 |
>> Hi all, |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> As discussed in bug #222721, portage has changed the execution order |
6 |
>> of phases. It seems the change was introduced in portage-2.1.5 and it |
7 |
>> makes that, when upgrading a package, pkg_postinst is run after the |
8 |
>> old version has been removed. This breaks packages which use |
9 |
>> has_version in pkg_postinst to detect upgrades/downgrades. It can also |
10 |
>> break packages in more subtle ways. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> So someone that has access permissions here: Please do fix the devmanual |
14 |
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/functions/pkg_postinst/index.html |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226419 |
18 |
|
19 |
Regards, |
20 |
-- |
21 |
Santiago M. Mola |
22 |
Jabber ID: cooldwind@×××××.com |
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |