Archives
Archives
| From: | "Jörg Schaible" <joerg.schaible@×××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ?? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:16:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | od572r$f0h$1@blaine.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ?? by James Le Cuirot |
||
| 1 | James Le Cuirot wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:12:13 +0200 |
| 4 | > Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | >> As said, I synced the tree twice this morning (4 hours ago) and the |
| 7 | >> KEYWORDS in the ebuild do not declare amd64 as stable although it was |
| 8 | >> committed to GIT already yesterday. And this is no wonder, because |
| 9 | >> the stable branch of the GIT mirror is still not up-to-date: |
| 10 | >> https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/gentoo/tree/stable/sys-devel/gcc |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > It's been held up by this outstanding issue: |
| 13 | > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/58d678e2a/output.html#dev-db/psqlodbc |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Thanks for the info. Always good to know, why something does not behave as |
| 17 | expected. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Cheers, |
| 20 | Jörg |