Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Userkit.eclass
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:40:07
Message-Id: assp.0140865882.25530652.rRlbQJgv4Y@wlt
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Userkit.eclass by Alec Warner
1 On Monday, November 28, 2016 10:42:54 AM EST Alec Warner wrote:
2 >
3 > Generally speaking as a fellow who maintained thousands of systems (many of
4 > which ran various operating systems.)
5 >
6 > You cannot rely on all OS vendors to synchronize uid / gid. You cannot even
7 > rely on some single vendors to synchronize uid / gids between releases of
8 > their own products.
9
10 I believe the main reason such is the case is a lack of any such list or
11 database for others to adhere to. Once again an area Gentoo could be leading.
12 Had Gentoo done this years ago others might have adopted.
13
14 IMHO it is something that should be a part of LSB. If not POSIX in general.
15 One cannot really change the past or current state of things. But can make the
16 future better.
17
18 For now who cares about other OS or distros. If Gentoo gets its house in order
19 others may follow.
20
21 --
22 William L. Thomson Jr.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Userkit.eclass "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Userkit.eclass Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>