Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jason Rhinelander <jason@××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ugly, nasty code in tetex.eclass
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 02:42:52
Message-Id: 4186F42A.9000007@gossamer-threads.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Ugly, nasty code in tetex.eclass by Georgi Georgiev
1 Georgi Georgiev wrote:
2 > I prefer to post it here, because this is yet another reason why all
3 > patches need to be removed from the portage tree.
4
5 Excellent! We now have *proof* that patches *anywhere* in the portage
6 tree are a bad thing and must be removed! Let's start a new thread
7 about this called "patches.gentoo.org" and everyone can chime in! Oh,
8 wait... Okay, let's call it "diffs.gentoo.org" so that it seems like
9 something new.
10
11 -- Jason Rhinelander
12
13 --
14 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Ugly, nasty code in tetex.eclass Andrew Cooks <andrew@××××××××××××.za>