| 1 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> posted 48E0784A.2040505@g.o, |
| 2 |
excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:40:10 -0700: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I'm not suggesting that the ebuild and the package set necessarily need |
| 5 |
> to have the same name. What I'm suggesting is that we use a |
| 6 |
> configuration file, distributed with the ebuild repository, to map set |
| 7 |
> names to ebuilds. This mapping would make the set name independent from |
| 8 |
> the ebuild name. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
That should work... and it could be as simple as the ebuild name, plus |
| 11 |
-set, so for example kde-meta and @kde-meta-set. If users mess /that/ |
| 12 |
up... is there any hope for them? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 16 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 17 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives