| 1 |
Mike Kelly wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:03:49 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Christian Heim <phreak@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On Saturday, 27. January. 2007 13:22:56 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> Raúl Porcel wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> # Raúl Porcel <armin76@g.o> (27 Jan 2007) |
| 8 |
>>>> # Masked for removal 26 Feb 2007, bug 135257, security issues |
| 9 |
>>>> # Replaced by www-client/seamonkey[-bin] |
| 10 |
>>>> www-client/mozilla |
| 11 |
>>>> www-client/mozilla-bin |
| 12 |
>>> How about not breaking the tree? |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "www-client/mozilla" have been |
| 15 |
>>> masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to |
| 16 |
>>> complete your request: |
| 17 |
>>> - www-client/mozilla-1.7.13 (masked by: package.mask) |
| 18 |
>> What about the rest of the portage error ? At least it could be used, |
| 19 |
>> to fix (well sort of) it :) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I think he just has www-client/mozilla in his world file. From what |
| 22 |
> I see, nothing in tree still depends on www-client/mozilla{,-bin}. |
| 23 |
> There's just a block against it by www-client/seamonkey. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
No. I used reverse dependencies scanning tools to find that and posted |
| 27 |
that as a mail. The issue was since resolved because I pointed it out. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Regards, |
| 30 |
Petteri |
Archives