Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] allow extra implementations of python
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 06:36:38
Message-Id: cfb24158c4f5a3d33677613f0ed408ffc809211d.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] allow extra implementations of python by William Hubbs
1 On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 17:36 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
2 > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:54:25AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
3 > > On Thu, 2020-03-26 at 22:12 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
4 > > > > > > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, William Hubbs wrote:
5 > > > > If there's a way inside an eclass to check that the ebuild inheriting
6 > > > > it is in ::gentoo, I will use it to die if the ebuild is in ::gentoo
7 > > > > and this variable is set.
8 > > >
9 > > > Oh please, not this again. An ebuild or eclass is supposed to work the
10 > > > same everywhere, independent of the repo it is located in.
11 > > >
12 > > > Why don't you simply copy the eclass to your overlay and do the changes
13 > > > there?
14 > > >
15 > >
16 > > They did, and then they complained that every few months they have to
17 > > update it. See the big slander mail from William.
18 >
19 > Michal,
20 >
21 > I already responded here on the list and apologized for the way I
22 > presented the original issues.
23 >
24 > So, I would appreciate it if you drop the slander accusation.
25 >
26
27 Apology accepted. I withdraw it.
28
29 --
30 Best regards,
31 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature