Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:21:44
Message-Id: 20120620132222.7c609f14@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5 by Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:14:38 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:12:25 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:02:42 +0100 > > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: > > > Please don't. User patches were discussed on this list, and > > > there's already wording written. We don't need a bug to track it. > > > > So you want requests here or do I have do look back to find that > > thread? > > I believe we consider the user patches feature to be finalised, so if > you want something else, it should be treated as a new feature rather > than a change. But please don't rehash anything that's already been > covered.
I simply don't get why the spec obligates package managers to support user patches while it doesn't provide any explanation how the patches should be applied nor any function to actually apply patches... -- Best regards, Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>