1 |
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:14:38 +0100 |
2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:12:25 +0200 |
5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:02:42 +0100 |
7 |
> > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
> > > Please don't. User patches were discussed on this list, and |
9 |
> > > there's already wording written. We don't need a bug to track it. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > So you want requests here or do I have do look back to find that |
12 |
> > thread? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I believe we consider the user patches feature to be finalised, so if |
15 |
> you want something else, it should be treated as a new feature rather |
16 |
> than a change. But please don't rehash anything that's already been |
17 |
> covered. |
18 |
|
19 |
I simply don't get why the spec obligates package managers to support |
20 |
user patches while it doesn't provide any explanation how the patches |
21 |
should be applied nor any function to actually apply patches... |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Best regards, |
25 |
Michał Górny |