| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:59:53 +0000 |
| 3 |
> Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> It's so that the ebuild's EAPI can be extracted. The way things are |
| 5 |
>>> currently, there is no way to get an ebuild's EAPI without already |
| 6 |
>>> knowing its EAPI. |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>> Like I said, it's trivial to extract a line from the ebuild without |
| 9 |
>> sourcing. You know it is, and so does everyone else. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Note *the way things are currently*. If you think this is untrue, |
| 12 |
> provide an algorithm that will correctly give the EAPI of any current |
| 13 |
> or future ebuild given that ebuild's filename (hint: you can't). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Simple. |
| 16 |
Whatever you'd like to have in the suffix, we can put it on the first line of |
| 17 |
the ebuild. |
| 18 |
Just go and get it, and that's the EAPI. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Zhang Le, Robert |
| 22 |
GPG key ID: 1E4E2973 |
| 23 |
Fingerprint: 0260 C902 B8F8 6506 6586 2B90 BC51 C808 1E4E 2973 |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives