| 1 |
Jan Kundrát wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Great, there was a bug. Yeah, there was. Please notice the word "was". |
| 4 |
> It means that it has been fixed and it isn't there anymore. So the |
| 5 |
> problem got fixed. It's over. Finito. Period. Why are you still talking |
| 6 |
> about it? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Because Becker needed to be informed about it. I know it was fixed, I am |
| 9 |
not bitching about it. I am merely pointing out that a stage3 installation |
| 10 |
isn't quite so simple to support and is just as prone (more prone in my |
| 11 |
opinion) to problems as a stage1 installation method. The main crux of |
| 12 |
what I am saying is that it is, in fact, more error prone and takes longer. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
>> The official gcc migration instructions happen to be |
| 15 |
>> the same for both a stage3 install and a running installation. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Do you have some problems with understanding an English text? It was |
| 18 |
> already stated several times that upgrading GCC from fresh stage3 is |
| 19 |
> *not* the same as in the live system. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Where are they then? How are they different? You might want to let someone |
| 22 |
else know. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives