Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/ffcall is looking for a new maintainer
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:20:17
Message-Id: 4FFEDB61.9060408@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/ffcall is looking for a new maintainer by Bernard Cafarelli
1 On 07/11/2012 04:36 PM, Bernard Cafarelli wrote:
2 > This package historically belongs to the gnustep herd, but ffcall
3 > support in
4 > gnustep has been deprecated for some time now in favor of libffi (in
5 > fact the
6 > USE-flag may go away soon)
7 >
8 > Also, I do not have the time to work on it, although it requires a bit
9 > of work:
10 > * switch to "new" upstream (recommending to grab CVS tarballs) at
11 > http://www.gnu.org/software/libffcall/
12 > * a bunch of opened issues (parallel make/install, ldflags, execstacks,
13 > ...):
14 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ffcall
15 >
16 > So if you are interested, please add yourself to metadata.xml (and remove
17 > gnustep herd) and start bug sqashing. As a bonus, you will still have a
18 > backup
19 > herd (common-lisp), thoug a real maintainer would be great
20 >
21 > Reverse RDEPEND for dev-libs/ffcall:
22 > dev-lang/gforth-0.7.0
23 > dev-lisp/clisp-2.47-r1 dev-lisp/clisp-2.48-r1 dev-lisp/clisp-2.48-r2
24 > gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.20.1:!libffi
25 > gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.24.0-r1:!libffi
26 >
27
28 libffi should be a full replacement and more widely adapted variant.
29 isn't it time to let this simply fade away (lastrite)?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-libs/ffcall is looking for a new maintainer Bernard Cafarelli <voyageur@g.o>