Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds!
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 06:21:13
Message-Id: 20120524002912.3ee171c7@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass no longer inherits eutils; check your ebuilds! by Zac Medico
On Wed, 23 May 2012 23:09:14 -0700
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:

> On 05/23/2012 11:11 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:44 +0200 > > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: > > > >> Looks like ebuilds not inheriting eutils directly even using epatch are > >> a lot as I have seen running: > >> grep inherit $(grep -r epatch */*/*.ebuild| cut -d: -f1) | grep -v > >> eutils > >> > >> Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when > >> an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwise > >> this problem could reappear if some other eclass no longer inherit it in > >> the future :-/ > > > > Maybe we should make eutils inheritance implicit so all ebuilds get epatch > > and friends automatically. Is there really that much overhead? Or am I > > missing something obvious? > > Do you mean in EAPI 5? We're already planning to include epatch, as part > of the epatch_user thing.
I did. That's awesome, thanks. -- fonts, gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature