Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 18:40:07
Message-Id: 20398.44617.452031.712699@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?) by "Michał Górny"
>>>>> On Sat, 12 May 2012, Micha³ Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 12 May 2012 19:57:07 +0200 > Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
>> > The current workaround for this is to use EXTRA_EMAKE from ebuild, >> > but I find this rather ugly (if not even forbidden by some PMS >> > magic?) >> >> EXTRA_EMAKE isn't mentioned by the PMS. Do all package managers >> support this variable? Portage does since 2004 at least.
> EXTRA_EMAKE isn't supposed to be mentioned there. It's an internal use > variable for users who need to pass something specific to make.
You are right, of course. (And this had been clarified before: <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_3d25b75236fe4d1e8008998e14fea164.xml>) I guess the following ebuilds should be fixed then: eclass/bsdmk.eclass eclass/python.eclass eclass/scons-utils.eclass dev-db/redis/redis-2.2.12.ebuild dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.4-r1.ebuild dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.7.ebuild dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.8.ebuild dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.10.ebuild dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.13.ebuild gnome-base/gconf/gconf-2.32.4.ebuild net-misc/mico/mico-2.3.13-r5.ebuild sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r10.ebuild sys-fs/udev/udev-171-r5.ebuild Ulrich

Replies