| 1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 12 May 2012, Micha³ Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Sat, 12 May 2012 19:57:07 +0200 |
| 4 |
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
>> > The current workaround for this is to use EXTRA_EMAKE from ebuild, |
| 7 |
>> > but I find this rather ugly (if not even forbidden by some PMS |
| 8 |
>> > magic?) |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> EXTRA_EMAKE isn't mentioned by the PMS. Do all package managers |
| 11 |
>> support this variable? Portage does since 2004 at least. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> EXTRA_EMAKE isn't supposed to be mentioned there. It's an internal use |
| 14 |
> variable for users who need to pass something specific to make. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You are right, of course. (And this had been clarified before: |
| 17 |
<http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_3d25b75236fe4d1e8008998e14fea164.xml>) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I guess the following ebuilds should be fixed then: |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
eclass/bsdmk.eclass |
| 22 |
eclass/python.eclass |
| 23 |
eclass/scons-utils.eclass |
| 24 |
dev-db/redis/redis-2.2.12.ebuild |
| 25 |
dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.4-r1.ebuild |
| 26 |
dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.7.ebuild |
| 27 |
dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.8.ebuild |
| 28 |
dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.10.ebuild |
| 29 |
dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.13.ebuild |
| 30 |
gnome-base/gconf/gconf-2.32.4.ebuild |
| 31 |
net-misc/mico/mico-2.3.13-r5.ebuild |
| 32 |
sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r10.ebuild |
| 33 |
sys-fs/udev/udev-171-r5.ebuild |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Ulrich |
Archives